NETWORK MARKETING/MLM consultant practice tips. Every NETWORK MARKETING/MLM company should establish an NETWORK MARKETING/MLM distributor relations and NETWORK MARKETING/MLM compliance department.   Success in the NETWORK MARKETING/MLM field is dependent on continuous NETWORK MARKETING/MLM Support and NETWORK MARKETING/MLM Communications relationship that demonstrates ongoing support in NETWORK MARKETING/MLM Marketing issues and is clear on guidelines for compliance with NETWORK MARKETING/MLM Business and NETWORK MARKETING/MLM Law issues. NETWORK MARKETING/MLM Legal and NETWORK MARKETING/MLMLegal.com and Babener and Associates provides expert NETWORK MARKETING/MLM Consultant and NETWORK MARKETING/MLM Consulting advise on NETWORK MARKETING/MLM corporate, NETWORK MARKETING/MLM software, NETWORK MARKETING/MLM Compensation, NETWORK MARKETING/MLM Taxes, etc. NETWORK MARKETING/MLM Consulting is an important component for NETWORK MARKETING/MLM startup.  Careful Choice of NETWORK MARKETING/MLM Software is another component of NETWORK MARKETING/MLM Corporate.  An NETWORK MARKETING/MLM Consultant and NETWORK MARKETING/MLM Law and NETWORK MARKETING/MLM Legal is part of the NETWORK MARKETING/MLM Startup Team.  NETWORK MARKETING/MLM Compensation must be reviewed by an NETWORK MARKETING/MLM Consulting standpoint by an NETWORK MARKETING/MLM Consultant and NETWORK MARKETING/MLM Legal and NETWORK MARKETING/MLM Law professional and programmed by a NETWORK MARKETING/MLM Software and NETWORK MARKETING/MLM Technology provider.

MLM: A BRIEF HISTORY OF NETWORK MARKETING
By Jeffrey A. Babener
Consultant specialists in the field of DIRECT SELLING/DIRECT SALES retention will assist in raising retention levels.    DIRECT SELLING/DIRECT SALES Legal and DIRECT SELLING/MLMLegal.com and Babener and Associates provides expert DIRECT SELLING/DIRECT SALES Consultant and DIRECT SELLING/DIRECT SALES Consulting advise on DIRECT SELLING/DIRECT SALES corporate, DIRECT SELLING/DIRECT SALES software, DIRECT SELLING/DIRECT SALES Compensation, DIRECT SELLING/DIRECT SALES Taxes, etc. DIRECT SELLING/DIRECT SALES Consulting is an important component for DIRECT SELLING/DIRECT SALES startup.  Careful Choice of DIRECT SELLING/DIRECT SALES Software is another component of DIRECT SELLING/DIRECT SALES Corporate.  An DIRECT SELLING/DIRECT SALES Consultant and DIRECT SELLING/DIRECT SALES Law and DIRECT SELLING/DIRECT SALES Legal is part of the DIRECT SELLING/DIRECT SALES Startup Team.  DIRECT SELLING/DIRECT SALES Compensation must be reviewed by an DIRECT SELLING/DIRECT SALES Consulting standpoint by an DIRECT SELLING/DIRECT SALES Consultant and DIRECT SELLING/DIRECT SALES Legal and DIRECT SELLING/DIRECT SALES Law professional and programmed by a DIRECT SELLING/DIRECT SALES Software and DIRECT SELLING/DIRECT SALES Technology provider.

Cycle 6.   The 1970's   - A Decade of Legal Confrontation - Up With MLM -   Down With Pyramids

The Industry Owes Amway

No event and no legal ruling has had more impact on the direct sales industry than the landmark FTC v. Amway decision.   ( In the Matter of Amway ).   In 1975, the FTC accused Amway of operating as an illegal pyramid.   After four years of litigation, in 1979, Amway prevailed.   An administrative law judge ruled that Amway's multilevel marketing program was a legitimate business opportunity as opposed to a pyramid scheme.

Had Amway lost, MLM history after 1979 may have been nonexistent.   Amway's victory paved the way for hundreds of MLM companies that would follow.   So significant was the decision that the FTC during the next 20 years focused on "deceptive" practices of MLM companies such as earnings representations or medical claims rather than attacking the "structure" of MLM programs.   The industry owes Amway a debt of gratitude.

The "Pyramid" Cases

The MLM/network marketing/direct sales industry was proceeding on a safe legal course until a proliferation of pyramid programs appeared on the scene in the 1970's.   A promotion called "Dare To Be Great" promoted by Glen W. Turner was one example.   Like other pyramid schemes, the only "commodity" that moved through this program was money.   No viable goods or services, sold at fair market value, accompanied the recruiting activities.   Virtually every state had residents who were impacted by this and other programs which officials successfully argued were mere "headhunting" schemes.

The FTC established the earliest guidelines regulating illegal pyramids and other unlawful entrepreneurial chains: In Koscot Interplanetary Inc. , (1975), the FTC was highly critical of:

  • Large membership fees,
  • Front-end loading and inventory loading,
  • Programs in which distributors were misled as to the amount of commission they might reasonably earn, and
  • Programs in which commissions were not based on the sale of product to the ultimate consumers.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) also stepped into the Dare to Be Great picture, demonstrating that securities statutes also apply to the industry.   In SEC v. Glen W. Turner Inc., (1973), the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reaffirmed that the securities acts were "designed to protect the American public from speculative or fraudulent schemes of promoters."   The Dare To Be Great program was ruled to be an "investment   contract" under the securities laws and thus subject to regulation by the SEC.   This was a landmark ruling in establishing the distinction between "speculative or fraudulent schemes" and legitimate direct sales activities.   It also helped establish the SEC's role in upholding the rights of legally operating companies and the right to prosecute offenders.

The Koscot , Dare To Be Great , and other pyramid cases left a sour taste in the mouth of the American public.   The decisions during the early 1970s represent a low point in the legal history of the industry.   As a result of the activities of a few, the industry was penalized by an overreaction by regulatory authorities.   State legislators and attorneys general often dedicated themselves to eliminating all forms of direct sales activities in an attempt to leave no avenue open for illegal pyramid schemes or unethical salespeople to operate within their states' borders.   Virtually every state adopted "pyramid" statutes which, unfortunately, are often so vague and ambiguous as to invite arbitrary and capricious enforcement.   The industry also found itself affected by the application of combinations of business opportunity statutes, franchise and security statutes, state lottery, and referral statutes as well as enforcement activity by the U.S. Postal Service through its lottery and fraud statutes.

The Amway Safeguards Rule

The FTC's prosecution of Amway in the mid-1970's could have dealt a deathblow to the entire MLM/network marketing/direct sales industry.   In The Matter of Amway, 1979, the agency attempted to make the case that Amway was a pyramid scheme and, therefore, a deceptive trade practice under FTC consumer laws.

The case lasted several years.   Amway prevailed, and in the landmark 1979 ruling its marketing method was ruled to be a legitimate business opportunity.   This decision has become known as the "Amway Safeguards Rule," which is currently one of the most significant sets of legal standards by which courts and regulatory agencies determine the legitimacy of an MLM/network marketing/direct sales company.

In the administrative law judge's decision, three salutary features were pointed out with respect to the Amway program:

            1. Amway required its representatives to engage in retail selling, under the "ten retail customer policy," which appeared in the agreement that representatives signed upon enrollment.   This rule required that representatives make 10 sales to retail customers as a qualification for eligibility to receive commissions and bonuses on sales/purchases made by other representatives in their personal sales organization.

         2. Amway required its representatives to sell a minimum of 70% of previously purchased product before placing a new order.   (Amway's rules recognize "personal use" for purposes of the 70% rule.)

            3.  Amway had an official "buy-back" policy for unsold, unopened inventory.   This policy had some reasonable restrictions, including a specified maximum length of time since the item was originally purchased by the representative and that the item was still current in the company's product offerings to consumers.   The policy also included a minimal "restocking" fee.   (Buy-back policies are significant especially for their protection of representatives who choose to terminate their affiliation with a company, and do not want to be "stuck" with unsold inventory.)

By abiding by these three criteria, network marketing and direct sales companies provide themselves with an "umbrella of legal protection."   The Amway Safeguards Rule has been successfully cited many times since 1979 in defense of legally operating companies.

The Amway Case is Still the Rule

More than two decades later, and approaching the millennium, the Amway decision was cited in virtually every federal or state case involving an MLM company.   Although tension will always exist between the industry and government over the definition of a "retail sale"   [i.e., distributor personal use v. nonparticipant sales], the Amway safeguards test continues to be the "gold standard" in evaluating the difference between legitimate MLM v. illegal pyramids.

   

DIRECT SALES consultant practice tips. Many DIRECT SALES companies choose to provide DIRECT SALES Replicated websites for DIRECT SALES distributors.   In addition to providing camera ready copy for DIRECT SALES media advertising, DIRECT SALES replicated websites provide consistency in the DIRECT SALES Opportunity message and prevent erroneous or inappropriate claims about product, service, earnings and the DIRECT SALES Marketing and DIRECT SALES Compensation Plan.   DIRECT SALES Legal and MLMLegal.com and Babener and Associates provides expert DIRECT SALES Consultant and DIRECT SALES Consulting advise on DIRECT SALES corporate, DIRECT SALES software, DIRECT SALES Compensation, DIRECT SALES Taxes, etc. DIRECT SALES Consulting is an important component for DIRECT SALES startup.  Careful Choice of DIRECT SALES Software is another component of DIRECT SALES Corporate.  An DIRECT SALES Consultant and DIRECT SALES Law and DIRECT SALES Legal is part of the DIRECT SALES Startup Team.  DIRECT SALES Compensation must be reviewed by an DIRECT SALES Consulting standpoint by an DIRECT SALES Consultant and DIRECT SALES Legal and DIRECT SALES Law professional and programmed by a DIRECT SALES Software and DIRECT SALES Technology provider.